Dear Mr. Dobbs,
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS LETTER
The birth certificate issue, or lack thereof, in regards to Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold office is a “red herring”. I will speak more about this later on within this letter.

I am furnishing you with IRREFUTABLE PROOF that Barack Obama is not now, nor has he ever been and cannot ever be a “natural born citizen” of the United States and therefore is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President. I will include all necessary research data links for you.

Article II, Section I, Clause V of the U.S. Constitution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article Two of the United States Constitution # Clause 5: Qualifications_for_office

Qualifications for office:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

( or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution ) This clause was added because at the time of the adoption of the constitution, THERE WERE NO NATURAL BORN CITIZENS old enough to be president. They were merely naturalized citizens. They had no choice, but to “grandfather” themselves in. It is clear that their intentions for eligibility of future presidents would require that one be a natural born citizen. They did this as a safeguard to prevent an individual with divided loyalties or allegiances from entering the office of president. They did this to prevent someone who doesn’t have our country’s best interest at heart from assuming the role of Commander in Chief, such as the situation we currently find ourselves in.

Some will say that the term “natural born citizen” has never before been properly defined. That simply is not true, as it has been defined quite well. The founding fathers and framers of the U.S. Constitution, as did almost all nations, used the writings of Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as a guide in adopting and writing their laws.
Vattel here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerich_de_Vattel
Read what one of our founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin, wrote in regards to Vattel’s writings. It is the first post on the page,
Here: http://thelibertypole.ning.com/forum/topics/natural-born-citizen

Vattel used the term “natural born citizen”, which is used only one time in the U.S. Constitution for the purpose of presidential eligibility, and he defined it as “those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” That is parents, plural, as in two or both.
Here: http://www.thebirthers.org/USC/Vattel.html
Here: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/18/two-minute-warning-vattel-decoded/

The “Law of Nations” was used by John Jay, who later went on to become the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Jay had the clause inserted into the Constitution via a letter that he wrote to George Washington, the leader of the Constitutional Convention. Jay was considered to be the outstanding legal scholar of his time. He was also considered to be the architect of the U.S. Constitution. He was the one who was responsible for inserting the term natural born citizen, which was derived from the Law of Nations, into the U. S. Constitution.

John Jay wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
The document is here; begin reading at the second paragraph. Click on the image to enlarge,
Here: http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/rr131/stevesharp2918/JohnJay-NBCletter.jpg

John Armor Bingham was a Republican congressman from Ohio, America, judge advocate in the trial of the Abraham Lincoln assassination and a prosecutor in the impeachment trials of Andrew Johnson. He is also the principal framer and architect of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

John Bingham confirms the understanding that the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866: {{quote} I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is”, in the language of your Constitution itself, “a natural born citizen”….}} Obama had one U.S. citizen parent and his other parent owed allegiance the British Crown.
Look under the heading “Later life” about two thirds of the way down the page,
Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bingham

As recently as last year, 2008, our own government officials, through Senate Resolution 511, also agreed that one of the requirements to be a natural born citizen was to be, someone born to two U.S. citizen parents.
Here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511

Notice, that in Senate Resolution 511, it refers to the First Congress as a source for determining that Senator John McCain should be deemed a natural born citizen. In that First Congress document it also states that citizen PARENTS (plural) are a requirement for natural born citizen status. Of course that is a problem for Barack Obama, but there may be another problem for him in other wording contained within this document. Here is a direct quote; “And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.” Uh, Oh!!! Obama was one of the co-signers of SR 511. Is being in the U.S. on a temporary student visa, as was Barack Obama Sr., considered as being resident? Hmmm??? We will probably never know.
Look within the [104] marker and about two thirds of the way down through the paragraph.

Here: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/1st_Congress/2nd_Session/Chapter_3
They made this assertion in an effort to establish that Senator John McCain was a natural born citizen, since his citizenship status was being challenged.
Here: http://naturalborncitiz en.wor dpress.com/2009/06/24/why-do-both-obamas-state-department-and-the-senate-require-two-us-citizen-parents-for-those-born-abroad-to-attain-natural-born-citizen-status/

I don’t think Senate Resolution 511 holds much legal weight due to the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court is the only true and final authoritative rule on matters of wording and interpretation of the constitution. It does at least exhibit the fact that they all agreed that being born to two U.S. citizen parents was one of the requirements in being a natural born citizen. Notice that in all the wording of Senate Resolution 511 and statements made from witnesses, Senator Leahy and Secretary Cherthoff, that they say “citizen parents”, (plural) as in two or both parents.

Barack Obama clearly and openly admitted on his own, “Fight the Smears”, web site that when he was born his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a citizen of Kenya. Click on the image to enlarge,
Here: http://www.total411.info/2009/07/obama-scrubs-website-admitting-to.html
Note: Barack Obama’s “Fight the Smears” web site, as well as almost all web sites that ever contained anything that would expose Obama, has been scrubbed, hence the “screen grab” links.

Kenya, at that time, was a British Colony and Obama Jr.’s citizenship status fell under the “British Nationality Act of 1948″.
Here: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/the-relevant-obama-admission/
Barack Obama was born to one U.S. citizen (mother) and one British subject (father) and at the time of his birth held dual citizenships of Great Britain and the U.S. A natural born citizen cannot, under any circumstances, be born with or have dual citizenship and owe any allegiance to any foreign nation. Obama has also admitted on his “Fight the Smears” web site that his citizenship status, at the time of his birth and due to his father’s nationality, fell under the jurisdiction of the nation of Great Britain. That is a problem for Barack Obama and there is no denying this irrefutable fact.
Again here: http://www.total411.info/2009/07/obama-scrubs-website-admitting-to.html

The term natural born citizen has already been previously determined and ruled on by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. A precedent has been established by the Supreme Court. There is no getting around this.
Here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=5&invol=137
Begin reading here at about the 18th paragraph where this, “ POINT II: UNITED STATES LAW INCLUDES”  is highlighted in blue. http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/scotus-has-no-original-jurisdiction-to-issue-writs-of-quo-warranto-legal-presumption-in-favor-of-natural-born-citizen-clause-and-effect/
There are several other court cases in which natural born citizenship has been addressed and not a single one of them support Obama’s assertion that he is a natural born citizen. NOT ONE!!!!
Some are listed here: http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm

I have NOT intentionally omitted any reference to any court case that would weigh favorably towards Obama’s eligibility plight. I have not been able to find any and to my knowledge, they simply do not exist. Not a single case. NONE!!!

Obama’s supporters will make up all sorts of lies to credit him. They will and have said things like, “The Supreme Court has already ruled that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen and that he is eligible”. Its complete hogwash!!! To present date, not one single law suit that has been filed against Obama has ever been heard on it’s merits by a judge. Almost every single case has been refused on the grounds of “standing”, meaning that “we the people” have no right to question Obama. Its absolutely absurd, isn’t it?

Some, even Barack Obama himself, will try to say that the Fourteenth Amendment confirms his eligibility. This also is simply not true. The 14th amendment NEVER mentions natural born citizenship in it anywhere or in any form or fashion. Also you may have noticed, in the the link that I posted above, that the case of Marbury vs. Madison strikes down that notion.
Here: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/pdf/con025.pdf
More on the 14th Amendment problem for Barack Obama.
Here: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/neither-14th-amendment-nor-wong-kim-ark.html

There are different classifications of citizenship, such as U.S. citizen and naturalized citizen, both of which are referred to in the 14th Amendment, and then there is natural born citizen. There is a difference and when the defenders of Barack Obama try to make their arguments they will continually throw out the words “U.S. Citizen” or “Native born”, but they will never use the term “natural born citizen”. They will avoid it like the plague. Don’t let them get away with it. Always remember that when the issue is being debated and references are being thrown your way in regards to Obama’s “citizenship”, stop them in their tracks and make them show you where their references to Obama’s “natural born citizenship” can be found. They will become extremely flustered and may possibly even try to recite some law or passage, but it will never contain the phrase, natural born citizen. If it does, it would simply mean that they hammered a nail in their own coffin, because as I have already proven here, a natural born citizen is required to have been born of (1) TWO U.S. CITIZEN PARENTS, (2) ON U.S. SOIL, and (3) cannot fall under the jurisdiction of or owe any allegiance to any foreign nation. While #1 and #3 go hand in hand, all three of these are required and all three DO matter . Barack Obama absolutely lacks #1 and #3 and possibly #2 We will get back to #2 a little later in this letter.

I could go on and on and on with more documented references to the definition and determination of the natural born citizen clause within the constitution, but I think by now that I have made my case and you are well informed. Just incase you want to see more facts, I will add an additional link to some more excellent references.
Here: http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

I would also like to add that the guest on your radio show, that was touted as the foremost authority on citizenship, misinformed you and your listeners. On second thought, I will rephrase that; He flat out lied to you!!!
You can listen here: http://citizenwells.com/

Recap video of the greatest hoax ever to be perpetrated on the Citizens of the United States.
Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI&feature=related
It can’t be told anymore clearer than that.

Congratulations!!! How does it feel to be a Birther?

Now Back To The Matter of The Birth Certificate

As I said earlier, I believe that the birth certificate issue is a “red herring” designed to distract people from the real problem of Obama’s birth status. I have absolutely no doubt that when the time is right, Usurper Obama WILL produce a “long form” birth certificate, whether it be authentic or the best forgery that money can buy, showing him to have been born in Hawaii. I think that anyone with at least half a brain can see this coming.

However, there does seem to be something that he is trying to hide in regards to his original birth certificate. No one spends around a million dollars to keep from having to show a $12 .50 document. There is a distinct possibility that he was born in Kenya. We just don’t know.

There are signed affidavits that originate from an interview with Obama’s grandmother, Sarah, in which she stated that she was present in the hospital room in Mombassa, Kenya where Barack was born.
Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OirvxsUsxb0
I believe that Attorney Phillip Berg, who has had or has several court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility, posses the affidavits, as well as the original audio tape of the phone conversation to Kenya.
Mr. Berg video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyspCRmJv7w&feature=related
Mr. Berg’s web site is here: http://www.obamacrimes.info/

There is also audio of an interview between a Chicago radio program and a Kenyan Ambassador in which the Ambassador also stated that Obama was born in Kenya.
Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH4GX3Otf14&feature=related

There have been headlines and articles from African print media which also state that Obama was born in Kenya. Is any of it true? I don’t know, but he is going to extreme lengths to hide something, thats for sure.
This image was from usafricaonline.com web site in 2008: http://www.usafricaonline.com/barackbama08usafrica.gif
This from graphicghana.com; read the fourth paragraph: http://www.graphicghana.com/news/page.php?news=2497
Again here, from modernghana.com:  http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/AfricaContinentOfHisBirth.htm

Possibly his VERY FIRST act as president / usurper was to sign an executive order into law (unlawful; a usurper can’t sign an executive order) that exempts him from having to disclose any personal documents, whatsoever. Wow!!!  Who does that?  Why was it the first order of business?  Why so urgent?
Here: http://freedomedium.com/2009/07/obama-signs-executive-order-barring-release-of-his-birth-certificate/

Earlier, I mentioned the possibility of a forged long form birth certificate being put forward. The reason that I would ever think that could be possible is that there is evidence that forgery of other documents may have already taken place. The online “Certification of Live Birth” / “short form” has MANY hallmarks of a tampered with or fabricated document.
Here: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2136816/posts

His Selective Service Registration Form / document for the military draft has some very alarming signs of tampering or outright fabrications also.
Here: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html

Unless he really was born in Kenya, which we simply do not know, the fact is that absolutely none of this matters. He was born with dual nationalities / citizenship and to one U.S. citizen parent.  Ineligible!!!

There are still other problems yet. It would seem that Obama was adopted by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, and lived in Indonesia where he went to school and had to relinquish his U.S. citizenship. This was required by the government to be able to enter into school. Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship. When did he relinquish his Indonesian citizenship and reaffirm his U.S. citizenship? There should be documentation of that. While there, Barack Obama’s legal name was changed to Barry Soetoro. When did he LEGALLY change his name back to Barack Obama? There should be documentation of that too. Did he fraudulently run for office on an alias name rather than on his legal name?
Here: http://www.daylife.com/photo/01u33pL9Ns06D

Obama stated in his memoirs that he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 via Indonesia where he stopped first to visit his mother. In 1981 Pakistan was under martial law and was on the U.S. government’s list of restricted countries for travel. Few U.S. passports were issued to civilians. How did he manage that? Did he acquire an Indonesian passport while visiting his mother there? How can an American get an Indonesian passport? They can’t, but an Indonesian citizen can.

While all of these secondary issues DO matter and should be resolved, they can all be set aside and put on the back burner for now, because no matter if he was born in Hawaii or if he was born in the oval office, he is not now, nor can he ever be a natural born citizen as defined by the sources that I have provided for you here.

Barack Obama is ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States.

Barack Obama is a USURPER!!!

Case Closed.

Sincerely,
Natural Born Citizen, Troy

P.S.
Dr. Orly Taitz is a national treasure. She is a naturalized U.S. citizen and formerly from Russia. She has seen firsthand and lived through the nightmare of Socialism. That is why she is fighting so hard to defend our constitution. She is a true patriot and while I admire her courage and very much appreciate her efforts, she doesn’t always articulate her facts as well as some others may. Instead of just interviewing Dr. Taitz, I implore you to also contact Attorney Mario Apuzzo and interview him as well. His contact information is posted on his web site.
Mr. Apuzzo’s web site is here: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/washington-times-national-weekly-20.html

Mr. Apuzzo, on behalf of plaintiff, Mr. Kerchner, is also currently in the middle of a very high profile law suit in challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama.

Here is one of a series of educational ads that are being ran in the Washington Times National Weekly by Mr. Kerchner, Mr. Apuzzo’s plaintiff in Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress. This particular ad is being ran on July 20th, 2009 on page nine.

Controls, to zoom in and out, are at the bottom of the pdf. page here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/17478578/Kerchner-et-al-v-Obama-Congress-et- al-Advertorial-in-20090720-Issue-Wash-Time s-Natl-Wkly-pg-9

Mr. Apuzzo will be able to, very eloquently, verify everything that I have laid out for you here. You and your radio listeners or television viewers would come away from the interview with a precise and clear understanding of the facts surrounding this issue of Obama’s ineligibility.

By the way, I was absolutely appalled and disgusted by the well planned, finely timed and executed, intentional hatchet job that Kitty Pilgrim performed in your absence, for the CNN interview of Dr. Taitz and Alan Keyes. She had a condescending smirk on her face before the interview ever even got underway and it was obvious that she enjoyed every last second of that “hit job”. Until then, I had always liked Ms. Pilgrim whenever she would fill in for you. Now, as far as I’m concerned, she deserves to go by the way of Susan Roesgen, Fired!!! It was inexcusable.